Ethical dilemma, analysing the dilemma using different ethical Essay

Ethical predicament, analysing the dilemma using different respectable theories (utilitarianizm, liberty, virtue) - Essay ExampleAccording to Catherine Berglund (2007) ethics is a process of mirror image. Reflecting on what is right and what seems to be wrong. Arguments be looked at and analysed in order to come to a conclusion. It is callable to medical ethics, that the right to consent and confidentiality have been identified (Holland, 2007). Ethical decisions are made every day, by every person. Is it right to park on disabled parking space when you rushing your child to the infirmary? Or, is it fair to lie to your partner even if you know that it would make him happy? This is just the tip of the deterrent example dilemmas iceberg. In December 2011 the conjoined twins Jesus and Emmanuel were born in Brazil each atomic number 53 have their own head, brain, nervous system, and spine. They share heart, lungs, liver and all lower body organs. Few eld before their birth Chilean conjoined twins Maria Paz and Maria Jose were separated followed by the terminal one of the girl a week later. The question is, should the conjoined twins be separated? Utilitarianism refers to the honorable possible action, which postulates that taking an appropriate course of action increases the chances of perfection (Manuel, Claire, Shanks & Meyer, 2011). Its moral worthiness is based on the consequences of actions (Rawls, 2011). Proponents of this theory are J.S. Mill and Jeremy Bentham (Rawls, 2011). The virtue theory, in this respect, emphasizes on the role of an persons character on with much(prenominal) virtues embodied by ones character in the evaluation and determination of ethical behaviour (Crisp & Slote, 1997). Arguably, the virtue ethics is among the key approaches to the normative ethics, which more often than not is contrasted to deontology (Stephen, 2003). Liberty theory, on the other hand, holds that the fundamental moral concepts are the individual human ri ghts (Devettere, 2002). It holds that rights to be respected are the ONINTERFERENCE rights (Devettere, 2002). Generally, these are categorized under rights to property, to life, and to liberty. In the spirit of liberalism, the proper limit to an individuals enjoyment of such rights is her or his duty to respect similar rights of other people. A non-interference or negative right is an individuals legitimate claim, which holds that other individuals should not interfere with her or him in any way. A exacting right is the individuals legitimate claim that society or possibly the government pass on her or him with that which he/she requires (Devettere, 2002). Clearly, there are considerable differences in the approaches of the three theories to be applied in this case. Utilitarianism might be considered as an ethical approach that is quantitative and reductionist (Stephen, 2003). It considerably differs from other ethical theories such as deontological ethics, virtue ethics, pragmati c ethics and other consequentiality approaches (Stephen, 2003). While deontological ethics differ from utilitarianism in their disregard for consequantialism, pragmatic, virtue and other consequentiality ethics differ from utilitarianism through their considerable regard of character as an aspect that determines the achievement of pleasurable ethical results (Crisp & Slote, 1997). Utilitarianism theory is arguably the greatest principle that allows achieving happiness and bliss (Rawls, 2011). While applying the utilitarian theory to this case, it can be argued that