'Discretion in the Criminal Justice System\r'

' devising executive decisions in the criminal justice formation is the underlying power of legal authority. Police, correctional officers, judge and so on hold the ability to pass on fragilityary decisions based on the situation they be involved in. There are a var. of ways that authority theatrical role prudence nevertheless it may be different when involving different situations or even different people, i. e. , novels or adults. I powerfully believe that the discretion occasiond in today’s society is distri alo direct in an appropriate manner.Shifting the aggregate of discretion within our justice system could be for better or worse, but why insure several(prenominal)thing thats not broken? Although most practice of law officers use discretion, â€Å"Many police officers (and whole departments) prefer to concentrate on the justice aspects of police work: get offenders off the streets, responding to emergencies, scoring big drug busts, and primarily Ã¢â‚¬Ë œcatching the bad guys. ‘” (Fuller, J. R. Pg. 6. ) No matter how a close deal discretion you give an officer, its ultimately their choice to use it.Although it is common throughout the criminal justice system, some authoritative figures don’t use discretion in a way to guide punishments; they perplex in accordance with established guidelines. In my opinion, depending on the severity of the crime discretion should or should not be used. For example, discretion should be used for a start time offender for speeding but should not be used for a first time offender of rape. â€Å"The police are typic exclusivelyy the first contact that young victims and delinquents have with the juvenile justice system. As with adults, law enforcement serves as the ostiary to the justice system. ” (Fuller, J.R. Pg 17. ) It is extremely important for a police officer to make the decision of introducing a juvenile to the justice system. The responsibility for authorities to u se discretion is crucial for a juveniles future. With adults, less discretion could be used because they have a greater adept of morals. In todays society I have personally seen adults expect leniency just because, for example, they have a police organization bumper sticker. Enforcing the law for adults who are prevalent offenders is necessary to uphold order. One can unless push society and the law so cold; at some point you must shell the consequences.As we talked about in class, the 3-strike rule is a becoming method of deciding who should be held accountable. â€Å"Three study studies were commissioned to examine police practices in lucubrate and to update the 1931 Wickersham commission state (National cathexis on Law Observance and Enforcement, 1971). These include the report of the chairperson’s Commission on Law Enforcement and boldness of Justice (1967) entitled The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society (1967), a report of the National Advisory Commissio n on courtly Disorders (1968), and a report of the National Advisory Commission on roughshod Justice Standards and Goals (1973).Each of these commissions was a major undertaking by a large digit of scholars and practitioners who focused on solving some of the problems in both policing and the criminal justice system as a whole. The commission reports include multiple proposals to change the controls over police discretion, including the use and abuse of force. ” (Alpert, Dunham. Pg. 11. ) Whether for good or bad; laws shape citizens views of beliefs, actions and character.Unfortunately not all systems of morality and discretion are used properly. dainty should be used in moderation and to go on order in society, not used in excessive amounts to threaten the laws purpose. In summary, I have discretion is a necessity. With our overcrowded jails, police and judges need to use their training, insight and experience to keep the human beings safe from individuals that have n o regard for the law. Bibliography * Alpert, Geoffrey P. ; Dunham, Roger G…Understanding Police Use of Force: Officers, Suspects, and Reciprocity. westbound Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2004. p 11. * Hagan, F. (2011). Ch 1. Essentials of Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology (pp. 1-45). New York, New York: assimilator Hall, third Edition. * Fuller, J. R. (2008). Juvenile Delinquency †Mainstream and Crosscurrents. New York, New York: Prentice Hall, 1st edition. * Owen, S. S. (2012). Foundations of criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\r\n'