Personality Analysis

reputation Analysis Shannon C. Chavez PSY/405 March 5, 2013 Dr. Barry Brooks Personality Analysis This paper depart include genius analysis between the acquisition guess and the mankind-centered and existential theories. The admiting theory is referred to as the process by which wholly souls learn and how they acquire a alternate or potential change in appearance (Feist & Feist, 2000). The schooling theories obscure ar mule skinners lookal analysis, Banduras brotherly cognitive theory, and Rotter and Mischels cognitive social learning theory.The benignant-centered approach is focused on the souls potential and stresses the importance of self-actualization and the belief that volume are innately good. human-centered psychology assumes that mental and social problems are a direct result of superstars natural tendencies (Cherry, 2013). existentialist philosophy stresses the importance of free volition, freedom of choice by apiece individual, and the obl igation unrivalled takes on his or her bear life. This theory emphasizes the responsibility each person takes on the choices they make and what they make of themselves (Cherry, 2013).Combining these theories with the knowledge they possess outlines the rudiments of human nature and temper as it develops by the environs, particularly inside the social aspect while accommodating the powerful affects of ones own indispensable minds. Affects on Situational Behavior According to learning theory, individuals behave according to their environmental, cognitive, and sortal conditions. In Banduras social cognitive theory, he argues that large number endure learn new information and ports by watching what others do.This type of learning known as observational learning is explained in near behaviors (Cherry, 2013). In the behaviorist learning theory, learning takes place by trial and error, with individuals attempt different types of behaviors until they engage in one that is reinf orcing. Learning theory states individuals move over antecedently learned material as a means to arise familiar recognise values in similar situations (Feist & Feist, 2009). Behaviors produced at heart new situations allow the individual to review similar experiences to determine the crush course of action and forget then choose the one with a similar outcome.In some learning theories, the learner may become passive, and so responding to environmental stimulus. cognitive learning theory assumes all deal are logical beings whose behavior is determined by choices that make the most champion to them (Fritscher, 2011). Rotter believed humans interact with their environments through reinforcement. He assumed peoples situational behavior is a combination of their expectations of reinforcement and the amount of influence their needs motive in any given situation.His predictions of human behavior stem from ones expectancy, reinforcement value, behavior potential and psychologi cal situation (Feist and Feist, 2009). Mischels privateity theory shows that an individuals cognitive activities and situations play a racy role in behavior determination. Although he acknowledged this stability, he explained the environment has a powerful influence on behavior. Others theories bring up people are motivated by particular drives and traits that would make a persons behavior consistent (Feist and Feist, 2009).Humanistic approach from Rogers person-centered theory believes learning is implemented as an act to fulfill ones fullest potential. The actions of individuals in situational behavior are derived from their potential from which an individual is capable. In human-centered theory, people have cognitive needs by which they respond to accredited situations. Within a supportive environment, individuals learn and react appropriately in any situation based on what they have learned previously (Feist and Feist, 2009).According to a humanist approach, responses to a specific situation are straightway regarded towards personal growth fulfillment of current needs and satisfaction (McLeod, 2007). The individual allow always respond in a way that will lastly fulfill current needs. Personality Characteristic of Theories The learning theories suggest that personality is a combination of learned inclinations that continue throughout ones life. Learning theories are believed to have present awareness, which guides the development of personality according to how individuals anticipate specific evets, thus ll human behavior is influenced by anticipation (Feist & Feist, 2009). muleteer believed that human behavior was shaped by three forces natural selection, pagan practices, and an individuals history of reinforcements. Ultimately, Skinner believed that ones geographical environment and personal physical authority helped shape humans personality in general, however, the environment would be lively in the uniqueness of each individuals personal ity (Feist and Feist, 2009). Skinner defined personality as at best a repertory of behavior imparted by an organized set of contingencies (2009, p. 72). Bandura described the act of human nature as self-regulating, proactive, self-reflective, and self-organizing (2009, p. 486). He recognized that observational learning allows individuals to learn without performing the behavior. Rotter believed an individuals personal history and experiences was more powerful in shaping their personalities and goals, but emphasized the similarities in bothone, whereas Mischel considered an individuals differences and variations in behavior as more strong.He believed human behavior, through the cognitive-active personality system, adapts to the interaction of stable personality traits and the situation, which includes a number of personal variables (2009, p. 546). Kellys theory explains the idea that all people anticipate events by the meanings pose on those events and believes these constructs o f the world are how an individuals behavior is shaped. nation see the world in their own way and believe that every construction is open to revision (Feist and Feist, 2009).Skinners learning theories have been criticized for neither accommodating individual differences, intelligence, genetic promoters, nor the whole realm of personality (2009, p. 472). Humanistic psychology believes in the natural drive toward personal development, and the idea that people make decisions regardless of environmental factors. Free will is one of the most important factors in the development of ones personality, and the drive toward self-actualization is a powerful motivation for the creation of ones personality (Feist and Feist, 2009).According to the idea behind humanism, people make their own choices and are actively involved in the creation of their personalities. Rollo May theory includes three relationships that form the keister for personality ones relationship with the environment, with othe rs, and with oneself. The influence of all three relationships helps create and contributes to the personalitys ongoing reconstruction (Feist Feist, 2009). Maslow believed that biologic components provided the basic parameter for the individual however, environmental and cultural affects shaped the ego identity or personality (Feist Feist, 2009).Explanation of Interpersonal traffic The humanist/existential perspective assumed people associated with others to engage in productive and healthy relationships, although ultimately, they may be alone. Maslow believed in fulfilling love and belongingness starting and fulfilling this was a primal need filled by friendship, family, having a mate, and ultimately maintaining associations with others. He proposed fulfillment at this level was requirement for other levels of human success, through his hierarchy of needs (Feist Feist, 2009).Rogers believed growing up in a loving environment, having a caregiver who had positive regards, fost ered positive self-regard, which in wring promotes psychological growth. Positive experiences from others are also essential for an individuals development in mental health, thus success towards self-actualization (Cherry, 2013). Mays existentialism proposed that even though people associate with others, forming healthy relationships, they would ultimately choose who and what they will become.The basic idea of humanism and existentialism views interpersonal relationships as an inbuilt part of human life. Humanism views interpersonal relationships as an important factor in the development of personality. Maslow believed once an individuals fulfillment of interpersonal relationships was completed, they will have more confidence and esteem in social situations and will experience the reciprocity of love from those of importance to them (Feist and Feist, 2009).From a learning perspective, people tend to associate with others because they start out some type of reward for doing so. Hu mans originally formed groupings within their families to use as egis from enemy tribes and animals. This happens today when people form associations with those of the same interest group and are reinforced for the particular behaviors of that group. Even when not reinforced, people will continue to maintain close associations because of personal connections within the group from which they receive reinforcement (Feist & Feist, 2009).Social constructivism is defined as the knowledge, behavior, and personality constructed from social interactions and people build new ideas and concepts that are based on current and bygone knowledge or experience (Feist & Feist, 2009). Bandura believed people learn from their experiences, although lots of human learning is taken from the observation of others. Rotter believed human behavior is best predicted from an understanding of the interaction of people with their meaningful environments (2009, p. 510).Mischel also believed that an essen tial component of ones personality development was dependent on observations of others within the environment. Mischel and Rotter stressed the importance of learning within a social context, but Mischel continued to maintain his belief in the importance of genetic factors in the development of personality. Kelly believed social influences were much more significant in determining ones personality than biological ones. He believed humans are influenced by each other and in constructing their own personality, involving other influences from the environment (Feist and Feist, 2009).Kelly stated the actions of others do not mold their behavior rather, it is their interpretation of events that changes their behavior (2009, p. 572). Conclusion Learning theories define learning and its resulting behavior and personality as a response to the environment in which its consumed including biological considerations, whereas humanistic theory believes in a greater tendency for sexual human drive toward a goal and ultimately self-actualization.The different perspectives regarding the say-so of personalities on situational behavior, the distinct characteristics of personality and human nature, and the understanding of interpersonal relations all provide an abundance of thought and a more dimensional understanding of humanity within psychological thought process and its applications toward humankind. References Cherry, K. (2013). What is existential philosophy? Retrieved from http//psychology. about. com/od/eindex/g/def_existential. htm Cherry, K. (2013).Humanistic Psychology the Third Force in Psychology. Retrieved from http//psychology. about. com/od/historyofpsychology/a/hist_humanistic. htm Feist, J. and Feist, G. (2009) Theories of Personality (7th ed. ). Retrieved from the University of Phoenix eBook Collection online. New York McGraw Hill Fritscher, L. (2011). Cognitive Theory. Retrieved from http//phobias. about. com/od/glossary/g/cognitivethedef. htm McLeod, S. (200 7). Humanism. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http//www. simplypsychology. org/humanistic. html