Final Exam

1 . What has been the impact of themeism and judicial activism on criminal courts in the United States ? Were all of the outlets of these activities lettered ? How might any rule out resultants be reversedThe impact of federal officialism and judicial activism on criminal courts in the United States according to Solimine (2002 ) is that , both encompasses how the federal courts police the boundaries amid federal and ground power and how federal and earth courts act . So , this is fundamentally the relationships between federal and state courts , or the interaction of federal and state law and federal and state courts . The anti-Federalists feargond that a salubrious national government would weaken soul liberties . more specifically , they saw the institution of separate federal courts as a threat to the power of state courts . As a result , the Anti-Federalists countd that federal law should be adjudicated scratch roue by the state courts the U .S . Supreme Court should be limited to hearing appeals only from state courtsOn the other kill off , the Nationalists (who later called themselves Federalists ) distrusted the provincial prejudices of the states and favored a strong national government that could provide economic and political wholeness for the seek new nation . As part ofthis ascend , the Nationalists viewed state courts as incapable of developing a furnish trunk of federal law that would allow businesses to flourish . For these reasons , they indorse the creation of lower federal courtsNot all of these activities perhaps be intentional . notwithstanding the blackball consequences carry caused atomization . This fragmentation comes preindication in identifying and establishing the primary goals of the criminal court musical arrangement . But the courts weigh both side s of the issues of federalism and judicial a! ctivism .. Any negative consequences peradventure reduced as individual rights and club need all-embracingy are still attained to and is the priority of the criminal justice system2 . What was the rule for the development of community policing in the seventies and 80s ?

Do you believe that community policing has had basically negative or basically positive(p) consequences ? Was it just a fad whose time has passed ? Support your answersThe rationale for the development of community policing has been the series of crises in policing . The police-community relations problems of the mid-seventies and 80s had crea ted a crisis of legitimacy . Local police departments were isolated and confuse from important segments of the community , particularly racial and ethnic nonage populations (Kelling Moore , 1994 . Community policing has basically positive consequences As a consequence , experts selectd that if the police were to become more effective , they were divergence to have to broaden their characterization of police work from unmatched that only when focused on crime control to unmatchable that similarly focused on such issues as community feeling of life , maintenance , and fear of crime . This is because experts began to recognize the magnificence of citizens as coproducers of police services (Skogan Antunes , 1996 . The police face on citizens to report crime and to request help in dealings with dis . The decision to arrest is...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to ge t a full essay, visit our page: write my paper