Part 1 How would you describe the class task? The group task is to pip an unanimous decision. They have to do their duty, they have to overturn a consenus decision, so they ar forced to have a dialogue with an uttermost(a) diverse set of people. Why conflict arises? When they bring about a preceding vote, they find out that one jurywoman think the incriminate is not guilty beyond mediocre doubts. The some other 11 jurors are surprised and then quite tempestuous that HF does not see the obvious guilt in the case. involvement arise because of a different understanding of the reality, of different person-to-person situations (and prejudices) and patronizegrounds. The environment, the very luscious jury room and that the men occasion more and more weary enlarges all this too. What does HF/JL do to earnings make up ones mind? He instills doubt. He argues that it is wrong, even illegal, to send someone to death when theres reasonable doubt. premiere HF convinces anot her juror that the evidence is not proven. HF shows that every vote is worth as lots as the other ones, even if he is in nonage and sapidity jamd. What does HF/JL do not do to win order? HF maintained his composure, maintained diplomatic and tactful.
Even as the loner who disagreed with everyone, he never once let the others force per unit area him into thinking differently. Despite that, he also never fought hold with anger, never raised his voice, said the accused was innocent, claimed the other jurors were wrong. He never gave the others a reason to hate him with a in-person vengeance. Part 2 Does HF/JL maintain the same schema as in part 1? Rather than ! academic session back and allowing the others to prove wherefore he is wrong, he speaks up in part 2. He becomes more active, and... If you want to pull out a full essay, sound out it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment